In the novel All Quiet on the Western Front, the character Albert Kropp plays a vital role in exploring the ethics of war during World War I. The profound effects of war begin to shape the character of Albert Kropp, into one of disillusionment and skepticism. By examining Kropp’s actions, ideas, and decisions from the perspective of Jean-Paul Marat’s ideals as expressed in his newspaper, L’ami du peuple, we can delve into the ethical challenges he faces and the impact of war on his perspective. 

Albert Kropp, known for his intelligence and skepticism, challenges the traditional notions of war. He proposes a radical idea in which, “the ministers and generals of the two countries, dressed in bathing-drawers and armed with clubs, can have it out among themselves. Whoever survives, his country wins. That would be much simpler and more just than this arrangement, where the wrong people do the fighting” (Remarque, p. 45-46). It’s important to note that Kropp’s conception of a more just war revolves specifically around only a handful of important figures doing the fighting, in order to avoid such massive losses of life for little gain. This aligns with Marat’s call for wise individuals to, “prepare the triumph of the great truths that will bring about the reign of justice and freedom and solidify the foundations of public happiness” (L’ami Du Peuple, 1789). For Marat, it is necessary for the public to remain at peace. Kropp’s skepticism reflects his disillusionment with the arbitrary nature of war, questioning its justifications. Kropp’s method of reforming the war fits into the proposed triumphs of justice upon which Marat suggests be brought upon common peoples.

Kropp’s disillusionment with the war is a recurring theme. He dismisses the possibility of a peaceful future, bluntly denying the idea that there could be any possibility of peace after such a great war; he jokingly says that he’d instead get drunk, echoing Marat’s perception of corruption within governing bodies. Kropp’s lack of hope stems from his experiences on the battlefield, realizing that the war’s traumatic impact may never truly fade away. This sentiment is echoed through Kropp’s words when discussing the future. He says, “How can a man take all that stuff seriously when he’s once been out of here” (Remarque, p. 88). Kropp’s doubt in the recovery of the men in his society reflect the issues in which Marat argues against the Assembly, for Marat too loses faith in his own corrupted government and their inability to support the common people.

Kropp believes that human effort is meaningless in the face of the war’s imminent death. He adopts a nihilistic perspective, emphasizing the insignificance of individual agency, which is summed up in his phrase, “You’ll be dead one day, so what does it matter?” (Remarque, p. 88). This existential outlook resonates with Marat’s emphasis on the struggle against oppressive forces, highlighting the futility of action when confronted with overwhelming destruction.

Kropp frequently challenges authority figures and seeks revenge through unconventional means. His acts of defiance, such as dumping a toilet bucket on their superior, reflect his resistance against the dehumanizing effects of war. This aligns with Marat’s call for action against corrupt officials who abuse their positions, in which he voices in his newspaper, “LIBERTY WILL ROLL ALL THE TYRANTS OF THE UNIVERSE IN THE DUST” (L’ami du peuple, 1789). Marat strives for justice and retribution in the face of authority, similarly to Kropp.

Kropp displays compassion and empathy towards his comrades, assisting them in times of need. He demonstrates selflessness by helping a friend with lockjaw and providing comfort to Paul Baumer after his first hand-to-hand kill. These acts exemplify Kropp’s commitment to preserving human dignity and supporting his peers in a dehumanizing environment. Marat, in the same vein, would praise those who selflessly aim to defend their country against the tyrants who seek to destroy it.

As the war progresses, Kropp confronts the ethical dilemma of living as a war cripple. He expresses a strong aversion to the idea, stating that he would rather die than endure a life of physical impairment. This highlights the profound impact of war on an individual’s perception of quality of life and the ethical dimensions of personal suffering, something Marat would be familar with, as he himself contracted a skin disease which remained with him until his death. Unlike Kropp, however, Marat wanted to continue to live; to write for his country in his newspaper, for he believed that he needed to write radically to instill change upon his country against a corrupt governing body.

Kropp questions the righteousness of the war and challenges the notion of nationalistic pride. He recognizes that soldiers on both sides are driven by a sense of duty to protect their homelands, blurring the lines of morality. This introspection aligns with Marat’s critique of corrupt institutions, emphasizing the importance of solidarity and justice.

Albert Kropp’s character in All Quiet on the Western Front presents a thought-provoking exploration of the ethical dimensions of war through the lens of Jean-Paul Marat’s ideals. Kropp’s skepticism, disillusionment, and futility of effort resonate with Marat’s emphasis on challenging oppressive forces and seeking justice. His defiance of authority, compassion towards comrades, and confrontation with the dilemmas of disability and suicide highlight the moral complexities of war. Kropp’s character serves as a reminder of the profound impact that war has on individuals, raising important questions about the ethics of conflict and the pursuit of justice in the face of overwhelming destruction. His acts of compassion, resistance, and introspection showcase the profound impact of war on personal beliefs and values. Albert Kropp’s journey in All Quiet on the Western Front prompts us to reflect on the ethical dilemmas faced by those caught in the chaos of war and encourages us to question the justifications and consequences of armed conflict.