Himmelstoss through the eyes of Hume

In examining the character of Corporal Himmelstoss in “All Quiet on the Western Front” through the lens of David Hume’s philosophy, we gain insights into the ethical implications of his actions and motivations. Hume, a renowned philosopher known for his works like “A Treatise of Human Nature” and “An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals,” offers perspectives that resonate with the evaluation of Himmelstoss’ behavior.

According to Hume, “moral actions are not simply driven by a sense of their morality.” Instead, they stem from deeper motives, distinct from a mere recognition of their moral quality. When we scrutinize Himmelstoss’ conduct, it becomes clear that his motivations are fueled by a desire for power and control. He derives pleasure from harshly treating his recruits, issuing absurd and dangerous commands solely to exert dominance. Himmelstoss lacks genuine concern for the well-being and moral development of his subordinates, raising questions about the ethics of his actions in Hume’s framework.

Hume also highlights the dangerous relationship between power and tyranny, noting that even “the most despotic forms of power ultimately rely on public opinion.” Himmelstoss, as a corporal, wields a limited degree of authority within the military hierarchy. However, his hunger for power and underlying insecurities drive him to exercise his authority in a tyrannical manner. This abuse of power is evident in his harsh treatment of recruits and his intolerance of any form of questioning or defiance. Hume’s insights serve as a reminder that power, particularly in the hands of individuals with authoritarian tendencies, can easily lead to a disregard for moral considerations.

Moreover, Hume emphasizes the significance of public opinion in shaping and validating power. In Himmelstoss’ case, his initial enjoyment of the fear and subservience displayed by recruits demonstrates the influence of public opinion on his sense of authority. However, when his true nature is revealed and his abusive behavior comes to light, public opinion turns against him. The erosion of public support diminishes Himmelstoss’ power and undermines the respect he once commanded. Hume’s philosophy reinforces the importance of public opinion as a check on abusive behavior and the role it plays in holding individuals morally accountable.

Himmelstoss’ experience of war serves as a catalyst for transformation, aligning with Hume’s views on the impact of external realities on moral perspectives. The brutal realities of battle expose Himmelstoss to the true horrors of war, shattering his illusions of power and authority. Faced with imminent danger, his sadistic tendencies give way to panic and fear. This transformative experience prompts Himmelstoss to reevaluate his actions and attempt to make amends by showing kindness and compassion towards his comrades. Hume’s philosophy aligns with the idea that confronting the harsh realities of life and death can profoundly shape an individual’s moral sensibilities.

In conclusion, David Hume’s philosophy provides valuable insights into the ethical evaluation of Corporal Himmelstoss in “All Quiet on the Western Front.” Himmelstoss’ actions, driven by a thirst for power and dominance rather than genuine care for others, expose significant moral deficiencies. Hume’s perspectives on motivation, power dynamics, and the role of public opinion shed light on the ethical implications of Himmelstoss’ behavior, highlighting the dangers inherent in unchecked authority and the transformative impact of war on moral sensibilities. By applying Hume’s philosophy, we gain a deeper understanding of the character Himmelstoss and the universal moral principles that transcend individual circumstances.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s